Coskata Opens Demo Plant as Biofuels Creep Forward

The trash-to-traffic company that’s working with GE opens its demo plant and touts the novel business model.

Better late than never.

Coskata formally unveiled its 50,000 gallon a year demonstration plant for turning wood chips, garbage and all manner of organic material into liquid fuel, a step toward producing full-scale plants with its technology in the coming years. Earlier, the company had been aiming at erecting full-scale plants in 2010, but the economic downturn pushed its plans – and the plans of the whole biofuel industry – into the future.

The company takes a somewhat unusual approach to biofuels. It combines both thermochemical processes and biological processes to make fuel. Usually, companies either take one approach or another. Zeachem and Coskata both take a hybrid approach in an effort to boost yields. Coskata, though, can also turn a variety of garbage – old tires, wood chips, etc. – into fuel. Zeachem and most other biofuel companies try to generally focus on a single or a few feedstocks. By exploiting a wide variety of feedstocks, Coskata hopes to keep costs down.

Coskata first takes the garbage and turns it into a synthetic vapor courtesy of a Westinghouse plasma generator. Once the syngas is produced, it is fed to microbes that convert it to liquid fuels. The microbes live in large colonies that collect on membranes. Part of the company's intellectual property revolves around coming up with a way to let the microbes live as colonies and form slimes. Coskata has largely been concentrating its efforts on a few microbe species.

In the end, the fuel emits 96 percent fewer greenhouse gases than conventional gas and the company only uses half of the water in the manufacturing process. Although Coskata currently builds its own plants, in the long run it has talked about licensing the process, leaving the massive scaling-up job to the people who are already in the fuel business. Make fuel or license – it's a big debate in the biofuels industry. If anything, the cost of building ethanol plants has recently declined because many early companies are trying to sell mothballed plants. Valero, the big gas distributor, recently bought seven plants.

Ultimately, Coskata hopes to sell fuel for $1 a gallon.

General Motors will likely promote Coskata's fuel. It has invested in the company and says that half of its cars will be flex fuel cars that can drive on gas or ethanol by 2012. GM is also working with fuel companies to raise the ethanol content in transportation fuel from the 10 percent levels of today.

Comments [3]

  • russ 10/16/09 7:05 AM

    Hi Michael - Does Coskata provide any data to support their wild claims or just a press release.

    I believe they are saying they plan to break many laws of physics and engineering rules in the statements in your article.

    GM promoting the fuel is a ‘no loss’ position. When it fails they just walk away and say “we tried”.

    If Coskata was real they would do something and then talk - they are all talk and minimum do.

    Reply
  • Glenn2ns 10/16/09 6:21 PM

    I had heard the plasma was hugely uneconomic and not very effective.  Others with technolgy using the Fischer-tropsch chemical process have a delicate balance with catylsts to strike but it is tested technolgy.  Guatemala City has recently put a plan together to handle 30,000lb per day of newly collected refuse.  I heard from sources that 6,000 people/day support themselves scavenging off the existing refuse pile - let alone the daily collection.  Local municipalities buy power from the regional grid, but using this concept can produce their own power for a fraction and reduct the refuse.
    I’d love to hear more about the plasma. . .is it working anywhere?

    Reply
  • FDDoty 10/18/09 3:05 PM

    Their approach makes no sense, and their fuel costs will be enormous.  Making the syngas is 70% of the cost in a conventional BTL process.  Maybe they can reduce that a little by not needing a very clean syngas to feed the microbes.  But the microbe end sounds akin to non-photosynthetic algae processes, and Solazyme knows how much that costs - $425/gal.  (And no decimal point was left out there.)

    There are limited amounts of cheap feedstocks.  The only cellulosic feedstock with any chance of providing more than 2% of our transport fuel needs is wood, and that will be much more limited than most people appreciate within 5 years, after the hundreds of thousands of square miles of dead pine forests go up in forest fires, while Europe looks to import scores of megatons of wood pellets.  I’m still projecting wood pellets will be $400/ton in 2015.

    The best cellulosic processes are expected to be getting 50% efficiency within a few years.
    If the feedstock costs $400/ton and the plant gets 50% efficiency, the cellulosic ethanol it produces cannot cost less than $5.50/gal.

    Reply
.