• Monday, October 26, 2009 Latest Update: 2:00PM

Greentech Solar

Cutting the Fat, and Cost, Out of Solar

Lose the rack, says Zep Solar. Where is that confounded module?

There's a lot of metal in a solar array that doesn't need to be there, as far as Zep Solar is concerned.

The company, which spun out of High Sun Engineering, has come up with a mounting system that eliminates a significant amount of the racking required to erect a solar system and in turn lowers the cost. Zep claims it can trim the price of a solar system by 50 to 80 cents per watt, a sizeable discount. A University of California study stated that residential solar cost $5.40 a watt after installation and incentives in 2008 and many installers quote $7 to $6 per watt as the going price.

Additionally, modules employing Zep's mounting system can be installed onto a roof in four to six times less time, according to Christina Manansala, the vice president of operations. GroSolar, the prominent distributor and installer, has agreed to work with Zep. The coming-out party for Zep occurs later this week at Solar Power International.

Although it's not as glamorous as cell design or efficiency, installation is rapidly gaining more attention in the solar industry as a way to bring down costs and/or percolate demand. Installation can account for one-third of the cost of a solar project and in some ways it can be more difficult to control than manufacturing. The work ultimately has to be performed on location in varied conditions by people with a wide range of skills. Still, the "plumber's crack problem" is not the kind of research project that tends to attract DOE funds.

In recent years, Solar City, Sungevity and Global Solar Center have devised software that trim project planning and estimating costs. Akeena Solar and GreenRay have promoted all-in-one solar panels complete with inverters that reduce the amount of sawing and work that has to occur at a job site while Armageddon Energy has created an Ikea-like kit for assembling solar arrays in minutes. Home Depot is expected to put more emphasis on do-it-yourself kits. Another start-up, Sollega, has started to tout a one-piece rack from recycled plastic.

Large panel makers, meanwhile, are starting to tailor panels to particular roofs: module modularization like this echoes how the PC market evolved to better suit customer needs.

How does Zep's system work? Instead of mounting solar panels on the equivalent of a steel or aluminum coffee table, Zep props up on a device its calls the Interlock Zep. In layman's terms, the Interlock is essentially a leg that clamps onto the frame of a solar panel and serves to prop up the solar panel and fasten it to the other panels in the array. Instead of a table, you just buy the leg.

"You have to have a frame in the module so you already have a structure," said Manansala. "Why double up on it?"

The Interlock requires a special grooved frame. Zep, however, is already in negotiations with a couple of manufacturers on swapping out traditional frames with its grooved one. The grooved frame uses about the same amount of raw material, she added. The patents for the Interlock came though a little while ago.

Unlike Lighthammer Software, the company name was not coined as a tribute to Led Zeppelin. The founders wanted something short and "all of the good short words were taken," Manansala said. Zep just happened to be available.

Comments [5]

  • JoeJoe 10/26/09 4:00 PM

    Why spend millions on PV cell R&D to get a 20 cent per watt improvement in costs when you can use a snip-snap mounting system that lowers costs by 50 to 80 cents? I don’t get it. With manufacturers moving into installation you’d expect a more integrated feedback between the manufacturing end and the installation side. If these mounting widgets make sense, what’s preventing the module makers from incorporating them right at the factory? This optimization seems long overdue. Rooferguy… got any idea?

    Reply
  • FreeCleanSolar 10/28/09 12:58 PM

    Hey JoeJoe, if it works and gets tested properly, then it will be incorporated.  We’re at the early stages of solar industry growth and adoption.  Innovations like this are an example of the improvements in cost, quality and efficiency to come in the solar panel world.

    Reply
  • JoeJoe 10/28/09 1:25 PM

    I agree with your overall point but Solar Power Corporation started commercial production in 1973. I realize there have been ups and downs but this sort of innovation seems overdue. I’m also still waiting for the AC panels that JPL thought up in the late 1970s… Where’s my foil hat? It’s a conspiracy I tell you. Exxon and KFC have us in a vice… Meh… I’m gonna go down to the bunker and clean my guns again.

    Reply
  • rooferguy 11/11/09 9:19 PM

    Andalay has been on the market for about two years.  We’re now installing it on the east coast.  Great idea—and even better when the panels produce AC power.  Zep is a validation of this integrated racking concept, but I don’t see any wiring, though.

    Manufacturers have blinders on.  They are just concentrating on making their modules as cheap as possible, and a different extrusion that uses a bit more aluminum will cost them a bit more.  So they say “why should we build the frame into the module when it will increase the cost of the module by 20 cents/watt?”  So they don’t do it — completely ignoring the 75 cents/watt downstream savings by eliminating all those parts, speeding up installation, and improving reliability.

    Reply
  • Solvida 11/12/09 12:42 PM

    $0.75/watt savings is the number that ZEP marketing is throwing around. Don’t believe the hype just yet.

    Reply
.